™
When not to borrow: signs a short-term loan is the wrong answer
Most writing about business finance is about when to borrow. This one is about when not to. A short-term loan is a useful tool for a specific job — bridging a brief, defined cash gap — and like any tool it is the wrong choice for jobs it was not built for. Used in the wrong situation it does not solve the problem; it adds a cost on top of it. This piece is deliberately non-promotional. It sets out the signs that borrowing is the wrong answer, and points to the cheaper or better options that usually are the right one.
When the shortfall is structural, not a timing gap
The clearest sign to stop is when the gap is not a gap at all. If a company is short of cash every month, at this trading level, regardless of timing, that is not a working-capital cycle — it is a structural shortfall. Short-term finance can paper over one month, but the gap reopens the next, and borrowing again to fill it pays short-term pricing on a permanent problem. The cause is under-capitalisation or a margin that does not work, and neither is fixed by a loan. The honest move is to address the cause: re-price, cut cost, raise capital, or rethink the model. A bridge across a permanent gap just gets longer.
When you cannot name the repayment source
A short-term loan repays itself out of something specific — an invoice that lands, an order that pays, a banking cycle that turns. If you cannot point to a date and a source for where the repayment comes from, the loan has no exit. “Trade will pick up” is not a repayment source; a confirmed invoice due on the 20th is. When the source is vague, the risk is that the company borrows to survive the month and arrives at the end of the term no better placed to repay than it was at the start. The discipline of naming the repayment source before borrowing is the single best filter there is.
When you would be borrowing to repay other borrowing
Taking a new short-term loan to clear an existing debt — rolling one facility into another to buy time — is a warning sign, not a solution. Each roll adds cost and pushes the reckoning out without changing the underlying position. If the company is reaching for new credit to service old credit, the problem is the total debt load and the cash that has to feed it, and that is a conversation to have early and openly with existing creditors, not one to defer with another loan. If a Credicorp borrower is heading toward this, the operator’s help-with-payments routes are the place to start, not a fresh facility.
When a cheaper option is sitting right there
Sometimes borrowing is simply not the cheapest way to solve the problem, and a responsible lender will say so. Before taking a short-term loan, it is worth checking the alternatives that often cost less for the same job:
- A business overdraft for a small, very short-lived wobble — sometimes the simplest and cheapest cover.
- Agreed supplier terms. A supplier extending you a fortnight may cost nothing, where borrowing to pay them on time costs something.
- Chasing your own receivables. If customers owe you, collecting what is already yours beats borrowing against it.
- Invoice or asset finance where the need is recurring and tied to invoices or equipment rather than a one-off gap.
Credicorp is on the record pointing borrowers at alternatives to check first, because matching the solution to the need matters more than making a loan. If a cheaper option fits, take it.
When the loan would not actually fix the problem
The last test is the bluntest: would the money change anything? If a short-term loan would let the company seize a confirmed, profitable opportunity it could not otherwise fund, it is doing real work. If it would only delay a decision the business needs to make anyway — about a loss-making line, an unaffordable cost base, or a customer that never pays — then it is buying time, not a fix, and time bought with interest is the most expensive kind. Borrowing should move the company forward, not postpone the moment it has to stop.
The honest summary
A short-term loan is the right answer for a brief, defined gap with a named repayment source and a real purpose. It is the wrong answer when the shortfall is structural, when you cannot say where the repayment comes from, when you would be borrowing to repay other borrowing, when a cheaper option is available, or when the money would only delay a decision rather than enable one. Knowing when not to borrow is part of borrowing well — and a lender worth dealing with would rather you reached for the cheaper option than took a loan that does not help.